Bolton vs Oxford Utd
Sky Bet League One
8:00pm Tuesday 17th September

University of Bolton Stadium
(Att: 6786)

Keith Hill earned his first point as Bolton manager following a 0-0 Sky Bet League One draw with Oxford at the University of Bolton Stadium.
Wanderers declared 21 goals from the branch because a 0-0 draw with Coventry and had lost four games.
But Hill team withdrew from those drubbings, such as Saturday’s 6-1 defeat at Rotherham, to indicate brighter times ahead.
can easily have turned into three factors with this functionality. Will Buckley went closest with a shot.
Goalkeeper Simon Eastwood maintained out efforts that were additional from Ali Crawford along with the Dennis Politic.
As the contest improved, oxford, beaten now just once in six games in all competitions, revealed enterprise.
Bolton goalie Remi Matthews spared from Rob Dickie and Ben Woodburn in the opening stage and denied Cameron Brannagan early in the second half.
Bottom of this desk Wanderers, who began the year with a -12 points shortage, almost snatched a winner to tip the 20-yard drive of Jason Lowe for Eastwood.

Read more here: http://inovaassessoria.com/inova2/?p=21239

Bolton vs Oxford Utd
Sky Bet League One
8:00pm Tuesday 17th September

University of Bolton Stadium
(Att: 6786)

Keith Hill made his first point at the University of Bolton Stadium following a 0-0 Sky Bet League One draw with Oxford as Bolton manager.
Wanderers had dropped four games and declared 21 goals from the branch since a 0-0 draw with Coventry.
However, Hill’s enterprising team withdrew from those drubbings, such as last Saturday’s 6-1 defeat at Rotherham, to indicate brighter times ahead.
They might have turned into three points for this functionality. Can Buckley went closest with a 17th-minute shot against a pole.
Efforts that were further were kept out by goalkeeper Simon Eastwood from Ali Crawford and the Dennis Politic.
As the contest progressed oxford, defeated now once in six matches in all competitions, revealed more venture.
Bolton goalie Remi Matthews saved from Ben Woodburn and Rob Dickie and denied Cameron Brannagan early in the second half.
Bottom of the table Wanderers, who began the season with a factors shortage snatched a late winner only to tilt over Jason Lowe drive.

Read more here: http://inovaassessoria.com/inova2/?p=21239

AC Milan have fired head coach Marco Giampaolo, which makes his tenure in charge the shortest of any manager in club history.
Giampaolo was just hired as a substitute after a fifth-place conclusion supposed the club missed out on the Champions League for Gennaro Gattuso, who resigned as Milan boss.
Milan have dropped four of the seven Serie A matches this season under Giampaolo.
AC Milan admits it has relieved Mr. Marco Giampaolo in the position as coach of the first group, the club said in a statement on its site. The team is grateful to Marco for the job carried out and wishes him all the very best to come from his career.
Press said Milan are anticipated to substitute Giampaolo.
After losing 10 matches a Inter enthusiast pioli, trained the Nerazzurri throughout the 2016-17 year but has been terminated in May of the campaign.
Its the second coaching change in two days in Serie A later Eusebio Di Francesco left Sampdoria by mutual approval on Monday. Di Francesco replaced Giampaolo in the summer.

Read more here: http://cakesuppliesandrentals.com/2019/09/26/how-to-find-the-top-cricket-betting-sites-in-2019/

Q: Would you describe betting at simply horse racing or the Kentucky Derby in general? What exactly does it mean to”go off” in 10-1 odds or become a 33-1 long shot?
Ed, of Shiloh
A: Allow me to break this response into two components — the what and the how — so if I start burying you with too much info (as I sometimes do) you will have a working understanding of the numbers.
What it signifies is simple. The chances — 10 to 1, for instance — are simply a ratio or comparison of two numbers. The first number is the amount of money you’ll win if the horse does what you think it will. The next number is the amount you need to bet to win the very first number.So, let’s take your 10-1 example. What it implies is you will get $10 in winnings for every dollar you wager on that horse if it wins. Consequently, if you put a regular $2 wager, you will walk off with $22 — $20 in winnings (two times 10) plus the yield of your original $2. Similarly, if you’re feeling as frisky as a colt and wager $100 on a horse with 33-1 odds, you are going to scoop up $3,400 (33 days 100 in winnings and your original $100). If a horse gets 5-3 odds and you bet $30, you will take home $80 (10 times 5 and the initial $30). That’s all there is to it.
Now comes the trickier part: What’s this stuff figured? Why are a few horses given nearly even chances — say, 3-to-2 — while others may begin a race (“go off”) at 50-to-1? It is all of the result of pari-mutuel betting, which is the type of wagering utilized in most horse racing.
Pari-mutuel is just a high-falutin’ French expression that means”mutual stake.” In golf, as an example, players battle each other for a pot of cash offered by a sponsor. But when you bet on the ponies, you are fighting part of a pool of money that has been wagered by each one of the other bettors like yourself. You have a mutual stake in it as it were.
A few things should become evident immediately. The more that bettors prefer Horse A, the more money they are likely to bet on it. Because of this, they are saying the odds are great that it will win. But it also means those gamblers will win less per dollar bet because you have to divide the total pool of cash among a whole lot of individuals. But if few men and women are betting on Horse B, then they’ll take home a much bigger stack of money in case their horse wins because far fewer people are going to have claim to that exact same pool of cash.
And to make matters more interesting, these odds can keep changing in the days leading up into a race. As horse experts learn more about the numerous factors that go into their choice — the background of the horses and jockeys, injury rumors, weather prediction, etc. — they could start hedging their bets and begin laying down cash on additional entrances, thereby altering the amounts.
Now allow me to give you an oversimplified example of the way the chances are guessed. Let’s state this year’s Kentucky Derby was a three-horse race between Fleet o’ Foot, Not So Fast and Beetlebaum. Now, let us say people bought a total of $1,000 on those 3 steeds — $500 on Fleet, $300 on Fast and $200 on Beetlebaum. Here Is What could happen:
To begin with, the people accepting the bets would take their talk off the top because their fee for providing the support — usually 10 percent to 20 percent. Let’s say it is 10 percent. That leaves $900 since the payout to be divided among the winning bettors depending on the race outcome.
Now we have to figure out what they will win. This is the formula: The odds for each horse have been calculated by subtracting the amount bet on that horse from the available payout and dividing the result by the amount bet on that horse. Therefore for Fleet o’ Foot, you’d initially subtract 500 from 900 to get 400 and then divide by 500. The resulting odds are 4-to-5, meaning for every dollar you bet, you would win 80 cents plus your original dollar back if Fleet wins.
Likewise, Not So Quick’s odds would be 2-to-1 (900 minus 300 divided by 300) while Beetlebaum would go off at 7-to-2 (900 minus 200 divided by 200). So the less preferred a horse is, the worse (or”more”) its odds and the higher its payout as theoretically you’re assuming more risk if you gamble on it.
Real life, of course, isn’t so simple. This year’s Kentucky Derby had 20 horses along with the overall wagers of $139.2 million shattered the previous record of $137.9 million in 2015. Always Dreaming wound up spending $11.40 on a $2 bet to win.
Bettors also bet on a lot more than simply wins. In North Americathere are”place” bets that cover whether a horse places second or first. (In the Derby, Lookin in Lee paid $26.60 finishing second.) Additionally, there are”series” bets that pay if a horses finishes in the top three (Battle of Midway paid $20.80). Should you feel you have a lot of horse sense, you can risk your money on perfectas, trifectas and superfectas, where you try to forecast the exact order of finish for the first two, three or even four horses in a race. And so Forth.
As you may expect, as these stakes get ever more exotic, the calculations become increasingly complex although the core principle is exactly the same. Thank goodness modern computers can figure out it at a gallop.
TODAY’S TRIVIA
Which Kentucky Derby winner had the longest odds in history?
Answer to Sunday’s trivia: As of January, 31 states nevertheless can inflict the death penalty. Four others now have governors that have set a moratorium on its use. All 31 use lethal injection as their primary means of implementation but nine can use electrocution, six can utilize the gas chamber, three can use three and hanging could utilize the firing squad, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
More numbers to consider: Since 1976, there have been 1,453 executions, reaching a peak of 98 in 1999. This past year, the USA saw 30 sentenced to death and 20 — in five countries — were implemented. As of Oct. 1, there were 2,902 prisoners on death row (54 women). Since 1973, there have been 157 death-row exonerations. Former Gov. Pat Quinn abolished Illinois’ death penalty in March 2011.

Read more here: http://inovaassessoria.com/inova2/?p=21229

Q: Would you describe betting at the Kentucky Derby or horse racing? What exactly does it mean to”go off” at 10-1 odds or become a 33-1 long shot?
Ed, of Shiloh
A: Allow me to break this answer into two components — the what and how — so that if I start burying you with too much info (as I occasionally do) you will have a working understanding of the amounts.
What it signifies is simple. The odds — 10 to 1, for example — are simply a ratio or comparison of two numbers. The first number is the total amount of money you will win if the horse does what you think it will. The next number is the sum you want to wager to win the very first number.So, let us take your 10-1 example. What it implies is that you’ll get $10 in winnings for each and every dollar you bet on that horse when it wins. Consequently, if you put a regular $2 bet, you’ll walk off with $22 — $20 in winnings (two times 10) plus the return of your original $2. In the same way, if you are feeling as frisky as a colt and bet $100 on a horse with 33-1 odds, you’ll scoop up $3,400 (33 days 100 in winnings and your first $100). If a horse has 5-3 chances and you bet $30, then you’ll take home $80 (10 times 5 plus the initial $30). That’s all there’s to it.
Comes the trickier part: How is this stuff figured? Why are some horses given almost even chances — say, 3-to-2 — although others may begin a race (“go off”) in 50-to-1? It’s all the result of pari-mutuel gambling, which is the type of wagering used in most horse racing.
Pari-mutuel is merely a high-falutin’ French term that means”mutual bet.” In golf, as an instance, players battle each other for a pot of money provided by a host. But when you bet on the ponies, you’re fighting part of a pool of money that has been wagered by all of the other bettors like yourself. You all have a mutual stake in it as it were.
A couple of things should become evident immediately. The further that bettors prefer Horse A, the more money they are likely to bet on it. Because of this, they’re saying the odds are good it will win. But it also means that those gamblers will acquire less per dollar bet as you need to split the total pool of money among a whole lot of individuals. But if few men and women are betting on Horse B, then they will take home a much larger stack of cash in case their horse wins because far fewer people are going to have claim to the exact same pool of cash.
And to make things more interesting, these chances can keep changing in the days leading up into a race. As horse pros learn more about the many factors that go into their choice — the history of the horses and jockeys, trauma rumors, weather forecast, etc. — they could begin hedging their bets and start laying down money on additional entrances, thus altering the amounts.
Now allow me to give you an oversimplified example of how the odds are figured. Let’s state this year’s Kentucky Derby was a three-horse race involving Fleet o’ Foot, Not So Quick and Beetlebaum. Now, let’s say people bought a total of $1,000 on these three steeds — $500 on Fleet, $300 on Fast and $200 on Beetlebaum. Here Is What could happen:
First, the folks accepting the stakes would take their share off the top because their fee for supplying the service — usually 10 percent to 20 percent. Let’s say it’s 10 percent. That leaves $900 since the payout to be split among the winning bettors based on the race’s outcome.
Now we have to figure out what they could win. This is the formulation: The odds for each horse have been calculated by subtracting the total amount bet on that horse from the accessible payout and dividing the result by the amount bet on that horse. Therefore for Fleet o’ Foot, you’d first subtract 500 from 900 to get 400 and then split by 500. The resulting odds are 4-to-5, which means for every dollar you wager, you’d win 80 cents plus your initial buck back should Fleet wins.
Likewise, Not So Fast’s chances will be 2-to-1 (900 minus 300 divided by 300) while Beetlebaum would go off at 7-to-2 (900 minus 200 divided by 200). So the less favored a horse is, the worse (or”longer”) its odds and the higher its payout as theoretically you’re assuming more risk if you gamble on it.
Real life, of course, isn’t that simple. This year’s Kentucky Derby had 20 horses along with the total wagers of $139.2 million shattered the previous record of $137.9 million in 2015. Always Dreaming wound up spending $11.40 on a $2 wager to win.
Bettors also bet on far more than simply wins. In North Americathere are”place” bets that pay if a horse places first or second. (At the Derby, Lookin in Lee paid $26.60 finishing second.) There are also”show” bets that pay if a horses finishes in the top three (Battle of Midway paid $20.80). If you feel you have a lot of horse sense, you can gamble your cash on perfectas, trifectas and superfectas, where you try to forecast the exact order of finish to your first two, three or four horses at a race. And so Forth.
As you may expect, because these bets get ever more exotic, the calculations become increasingly complex although the core principle is exactly the same. Thank goodness modern computers can figure it all out at a gallop.
TODAY’S TRIVIA
Which Kentucky Derby winner had the maximum odds in history?
Response to Sunday’s trivia: As of January, 31 states nevertheless can inflict the death penalty. Four others now have governors who have set a moratorium on its use. All 31 use lethal injection as their major way of execution but nine can utilize electrocution, six may utilize the gas chamber, three could use three and hanging can utilize the firing squad, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
More numbers to think about: Since 1976, there have been 1,453 executions, attaining a peak of 98 in 1999. This past year, the USA saw 30 sentenced to death and 20 — all in five countries — were implemented. As of Oct. 1, there were 2,902 prisoners on death row (54 women). Since 1973, there have been 157 death-row exonerations. Former Gov. Pat Quinn abolished Illinois’ death penalty in March 2011.

Read more here: http://inovaassessoria.com/inova2/?p=21229

Q: Can you explain betting at the Kentucky Derby or horse racing? What exactly does it mean to”go off” at 10-1 odds or be a 33-1 long shot?
Ed, of Shiloh
A: Allow me to break this answer into two parts — the what and how — so that if I start burying you with too much information (as I occasionally do) you hopefully will have a working understanding of these numbers.
What it means is easy. The odds — 10 to 1, for instance — are merely a ratio or comparison of two amounts. The first number is the amount of money you’ll win if the horse does what you think it will. The next number is the sum you want to bet to win the very first number.So, let us choose your 10-1 example. What it means is you will get $10 in winnings for every dollar you bet on that horse when it wins. Consequently, if you place a regular $2 wager, you’ll walk off with $22 — $20 in winnings (2 times 10) and also the yield of your original $2. In the same way, if you’re feeling as frisky as a colt and wager $100 to a horse with 33-1 odds, you are going to scoop up $3,400 (33 days 100 in winnings plus your original $100). If a horse gets 5-3 odds and you bet $30, then you will take home $80 (10 times 5 and the original $30). That’s all there’s to it.
Now comes the trickier part: How is this stuff figured? Why are some horses given almost even odds — say, 3-to-2 — although others might begin a race (“go off”) at 50-to-1? It’s all of the result of pari-mutuel gambling, that is the type of wagering used in most horse racing.
Pari-mutuel is just a high-falutin’ French expression that means”mutual bet.” In golf, for instance, players battle each other for a pot of cash provided by a sponsor. However, when you bet on the ponies, you’re fighting for part of a pool of money that has been wagered by all the other bettors like yourself. You all have a mutual stake in it as it were.
A few things should become obvious immediately. The more that bettors favor Horse A, the more money they’re likely to bet on it. As a result, they’re saying the odds are good it will win. But it also means those gamblers will acquire less per dollar bet as you need to split the total pool of money among a whole lot of people. Conversely, if few men and women are betting on Horse B, then they’ll take home a much bigger stack of money if their horse wins because far fewer people will have a claim to the same pool of money.
And to make matters more interesting, these odds can keep changing in the days leading up into a race. As horse pros learn more about the numerous factors that go into their choice — the background of their horses and jockeys, trauma rumors, weather forecast, etc. — they may start hedging their bets and start laying down cash on additional entrances, thereby altering the numbers.
Now allow me to give you an oversimplified example of the way the odds are guessed. Let’s say this year’s Kentucky Derby was a three-horse race involving Fleet o’ Foot, Not So Quick and Beetlebaum. Now, let us say folks bought a total of $1,000 on those 3 steeds — $500 on Fleet, $300 on Quick and $200 on Beetlebaum. Here’s what would happen:
First, the folks accepting the bets would take their talk off the top as their fee for providing the service — generally 10 percent to 20 percent. Let’s say it is 10 percent. That leaves $900 since the payout to be split among the winning bettors depending on the race’s outcome.
Today we have to figure out what they could win. This is the formula: The odds for each horse have been calculated by subtracting the total amount bet on that horse by the available payout and dividing the result by the amount bet on that horse. So for Fleet o’ Foot, you’d first subtract 500 from 900 to receive 400 and then divide by 500. The resulting chances are 4-to-5, meaning for every dollar you wager, you’d win 80 cents plus your original buck back if Fleet wins.
Similarly, Not So Fast’s odds would be 2-to-1 (900 minus 300 divided by 300) while Beetlebaum goes off at 7-to-2 (900 minus 200 divided by 200). So the less preferred a horse is, the worse (or”more”) its odds and the higher its payout because theoretically you are assuming more risk if you bet on it.
Real life, of course, isn’t that simple. This year’s Kentucky Derby had 20 horses and the overall wagers of $139.2 million shattered the previous record of $137.9 million in 2015. Always Dreaming wound up spending $11.40 on a $1 bet to win.
Bettors also bet on far more than just wins. In North Americathere are”place” bets that cover whether a horse places first or second. (At the Derby, Lookin at Lee compensated $26.60 finishing second.) There are also”show” bets that cover if a horses finishes in the top three (Battle of Midway paid $20.80). If you feel you have a great deal of horse sense, you can risk your money on perfectas, trifectas and superfectas, in which you try to predict the specific order of finish to the first two, three or four horses at a race. And so Forth.
As you might expect, as these bets get ever more exotic, the calculations become increasingly complex though the core principle is the same. Thank goodness modern computers can figure out it at a gallop.
TODAY’S TRIVIA
Which Kentucky Derby winner had the maximum odds in history?
Response to Sunday’s trivia: As of January, 31 states still can impose the death penalty. Four others currently have governors that have set a moratorium on its use. All 31 use lethal injection as their major way of execution but nine can use electrocution, six can use the gas chamber, three can use three and hanging can utilize the firing squad, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
More numbers to consider: Since 1976, there have been 1,453 executions, reaching a peak of 98 in 1999. Last year, the United States saw 30 sentenced to death and 20 — all in five countries — were implemented. As of Oct. 1, there were 2,902 prisoners on death row (54 girls ). Since 1973, there were 157 death-row exonerations. Former Gov. Pat Quinn abolished Illinois’ death penalty in March 2011.

Read more here: http://inovaassessoria.com/inova2/?p=21229

Q: Can you describe betting in general at just horse racing or the Kentucky Derby? What does it mean to”go off” at 10-1 odds or become a 33-1 long shot?
Ed, of Shiloh
A: Allow me to break this answer into two parts — the what and the how — so if I begin burying you with too much info (as I sometimes do) you hopefully will have a working understanding of the amounts.
What it signifies is simple. The chances — 10 to 1, for instance — are merely a ratio or comparison of two numbers. The first number is the total amount of money you will win if the horse does exactly what you think it will. The second number is the amount you want to wager to win the very first number.So, let’s choose your 10-1 example. What it means is you will get $10 in winnings for every dollar you wager on that horse when it wins. So, if you put a standard $2 bet, you will walk away with $22 — $20 in winnings (2 times 10) plus the return of your original $2. Similarly, if you’re feeling as frisky as a colt and bet $100 to a horse with 33-1 odds, you are going to scoop up $3,400 (33 times 100 in winnings plus your first $100). If a horse has 5-3 odds and you bet $30, then you will take home $80 (10 times 5 and the original $30). That’s all there is to it.
Now comes the trickier part: How is all this stuff figured? Why are some horses given almost even chances — state, 3-to-2 — while others may begin a race (“go off”) at 50-to-1? It’s all the result of pari-mutuel betting, which is the kind of wagering used in many horse racing.
Pari-mutuel is merely a high-falutin’ French expression that means”mutual stake.” In golf, as an example, players battle each other for a pot of cash offered by a sponsor. However, when you bet on the ponies, you are fighting part of a pool of money that’s been wagered by each one the other bettors like yourself. You have a mutual stake in it as it were.
A couple of things should become evident immediately. The more that bettors favor Horse A, the more money they are likely to bet on it. Because of this, they’re saying the chances are great it is going to win. But it also means that those gamblers will win less per dollar bet because you need to split the entire pool of cash among a whole lot of people. Conversely, if few people are gambling on Horse B, then they’ll take home a much larger pile of money in case their horse wins because far fewer people will have a claim to that exact same pool of cash.
And to make matters more interesting, these chances can keep changing in the days leading up to a race. As horse experts find out more about the many factors that go in their decision — the history of the horses and jockeys, injury rumors, weather prediction, etc. — they may start hedging their bets and begin laying down money on other entries, thereby altering the amounts.
Now allow me to give you an oversimplified example of how the odds are guessed. Let’s state that year’s Kentucky Derby was a three-horse race between Fleet o’ Foot, Not So Fast and Beetlebaum. Now, let us say people bought a total of $1,000 on those 3 steeds — $500 on Fleet, $300 on Quick and $200 on Beetlebaum. Here Is What could happen:
To begin with, the people accepting the bets would take their talk off the top because their fee for providing the support — usually 10 percent to 20 percent. Let’s say it is 10 percent. That leaves $900 since the payout to be split among the winning bettors based on the race’s outcome.
Today we have to figure out what they will win. This is the formula: The odds for each horse are calculated by subtracting the total amount bet on that horse by the available payout and dividing the result by the amount bet on that horse. Therefore for Fleet o’ Foot, you would first subtract 500 from 900 to receive 400 and then split by 500. The resulting odds are 4-to-5, meaning for every dollar you bet, you would win 80 cents plus your initial buck back if Fleet wins.
Similarly, Not So Fast’s chances would be 2-to-1 (900 minus 300 divided by 300) while Beetlebaum goes off at 7-to-2 (900 minus 200 divided by 200). So the less favored a horse is, the worse (or”longer”) its chances and the higher its payout because theoretically you are assuming more risk if you bet on it.
Real life, of course, isn’t that simple. This year’s Kentucky Derby had 20 horses and the total wagers of $139.2 million shattered the previous record of $137.9 million in 2015. Always Dreaming wound up spending $11.40 on a $1 wager to win.
Bettors also wager on a lot more than simply wins. In North Americathere are”place” bets that cover if a horse places second or first. (In the Derby, Lookin at Lee paid $26.60 finishing second.) There are also”show” bets that cover if a horses finishes in the top three (Battle of Midway compensated $20.80). If you think you have a lot of horse sense, you can risk your money on perfectas, trifectas and superfectas, where you try to forecast the exact order of finish to the first two, three or four horses at a race. And so on.
As you might expect, as these bets get ever more exotic, the calculations become increasingly complicated though the core principle is exactly the same. Thank goodness modern computers can figure it all out at a gallop.
TODAY’S TRIVIA
Which Kentucky Derby winner had the longest odds ever?
Answer to Sunday’s trivia: As of January, 31 states still can inflict the death penalty. Four others now have governors who have set a moratorium on its use. All 31 use lethal injection as their primary means of implementation but nine can use electrocution, six can utilize the gas chamber, three could use three and hanging could utilize the firing squad, according to the Death Penalty Information Center.
More numbers to think about: Since 1976, there have been 1,453 executions, attaining a peak of 98 in 1999. Last year, the United States saw 30 sentenced to death and 20 — all in five countries — were executed. As of Oct. 1, there were 2,902 prisoners on death row (54 women). Since 1973, there have been 157 death-row exonerations. Former Gov. Pat Quinn abolished Illinois’ death penalty in March 2011.

Read more here: http://inovaassessoria.com/inova2/?p=21229