Scotland could face punishment for theirremarks and behaviors after hinting in legal action when their World Cup game against Japan was under threat of cancellation.
World Rugby has affirmed it will convene a hearing of its independent disputes questionnaire, in light of Scotland Rugby Union (SRU) chief executive Mark Dodsons remarks a week.
Dodson hit out to cancel Scotland Pool A battle with Japan on Sunday because of Typhoon Hagibis, but World Cup organisers were able to point the game, which finished at a 28-21 defeat for the Scots.
On the times leading up to this clash, but now Scotland can face sanction for their behavior.
There are championship rules. Were extremely careful that individuals act appropriately, explained World Rugby chief operating officer Alan Gilpin.
We have referred to the independent disputes committee the comments and behaviours from the Scottish Rugby Union.
On this basis it is probably inappropriate to comment any further.
Dodson refused to rule out taking legal actions – when the game hadnt gone – during an outstanding snap press conference on Friday
Asked if further legal action may be a potential step in the event the match has been scrapped, Dodson explained:I believe our view is that we have to reflect on that matter at that moment.
This is really a glorious, world-class sporting occasion. We dont wish to be the people. But we dont need to be the collateral damage of this.
And thats the reason why we chose the legal route. It was only to say weve had another opinion, two distinct opinions, one by the QC that battles that rigidity over retrieval .
With the assembly in Kamaishi on Sunday of Namibia and Canada also falling foul of Japans largest storm since 1958 typhoon Hagibis pushed the cancellation of New Zealands clash with Italy and England game against France on Saturday.
World Cup rules say that any game cannot be staged on a day that is different.
Scotland felt those regulations were open to challenge due toforce majeure measures, together with Dodson repeatedly demanding acommon sense approach.
Gilpin insisted Tuesday that tournament rules had been followed through the typhoon.
Were very clear with everyone before the championship about the comprehensive contingency plans in place but also tournament rules about how contingency plans might be executed, said Gilpin.
Tournament rules for Rugby World Cup specify that for the pool period any match not completed on the day scheduled will probably be not moved to a different moment. This is clear from the tournament rules and not brand new .
These contingency plans were in place, such as backup venues. But the rules do not permit to become changed in pool games.
What became apparent was that the incredible size of this typhoon, with it being 1,400km broad just three match places were outside of the typhoons path.
Were not able to implement contingency plans that would take care of all games and teams consistently and fairly.
Wed just change those rules if we can take care of all teams consistently and fairly. But we could not.
So that led to this difficult decision to cancel two matches on Saturday.
For your four games on Sunday, we are aware that the typhoon is likely to have passed. But we knew that the match Kamaishi was at the most danger.
Unfortunately that meant we could not play the game.
We didnt have contingency venue plans for the other three games over the Sunday, however they were constantly dependent on damaged a result of the typhoon.
Pleasingly of class we played those three matches as scheduled. We were consistent with that which laid out prior to the tournament.
While wed proper discussions with numerous marriages, no conclusions were based on pressure from some particular marriages.
And its also important to explain that we didnt have those talks with Ireland.
Read more here: http://inovaassessoria.com/inova2/?p=22176